Survey
and Research Report
on the
Builders Building
1.
Name and location of the property: The
property known as the Builders Building is located at 312 W. Trade Street
in Charlotte, North Carolina.
2.
Name and address of the current owner(s)
of the property:
The
current owner of the Builders Building is:
The
Peace Building Inc.
312 West Trade Street, Suite 300
Charlotte, NC 28202-1665
The
current owner of the land on which the Builders Building sits is:
First Presbyterian Church
200 West Trade St.
Charlotte, N.C. 28202
3.
Representative photographs of the property:
This report contains representative photographs of the property. Click
here for photographs.
4.
A map depicting the location of the
property: This report contains a map depicting the location of the
property. The U.T.M. of the property is 17 514092E 3898471N

5.
Current deed book reference to the
property: The most recent deed to the Builders Building can be found
in Mecklenburg County Deed Book 5042, page 993. The Parcel Identification
Number of the property is 078-016-13B. The property is zoned UMUD.
6.
A brief historical sketch of the property:
This report contains a brief historical sketch of the property prepared by
Dr. Dan L. Morrill.
7.
A brief architectural description of the
property: This report contains a brief architectural description of
the property prepared by Dr. Dan L. Morrill.
8.
Documentation of why and in what ways the
property meets the criteria for designation set forth in N.C.G.S.
160A-400.5.
a.
Special significance in terms of its
history, architecture, and/or cultural importance. The
Charlotte-Mecklenburg Historic Landmarks Commission judges that the
Builders Building possesses special significance in terms of
Charlotte-Mecklenburg. The Commission bases its judgment on the following
considerations:
1.
The Builders Building, erected in 1926-27,
marked an important milestone in the history of the construction industry
in Charlotte, because it represented the first effort of contractors,
architects, and components manufactures to create a builders
exchange in this community.
2.
Charles E. Lambeth, the financier of the Builders Building, was an
important figure in New South Charlotte, including serving as Mayor from
1931 until 1933.
3.
M. R. “Steve” Marsh, the architect for the Builders Building, was a
leading architect in Charlotte and its environs from 1922 until 1964.
b.
Integrity of design, workmanship,
materials, feeling, and association.
The
Commission contends that the architectural description prepared by Dr. Dan
L. Morrill demonstrates that the exterior of the Builders Building meets
this criterion.
9.
Ad Valorem Tax Appraisal: The
Commission is aware that designation would allow the owner to apply for an
automatic deferral of 50% of the Ad Valorem taxes on all or any portion of
the property that becomes a designated “historic landmark.” The current
appraised value of the Builders Building is $1,585,700.
Date of preparation of
this report:
August 9, 2004
Prepared by:
Dr. Dan L. Morrill
Statement of Significance:
Summary
The Builders Building was designed by Charlotte architect and engineer
Marion Rossiter “Steve” Marsh (1901-1977) and constructed in 1926-27 in
response to the building boom that was occurring in Charlotte and its
environs during the years immediately following World War One. Its
purpose was to provide a single home for the principal participants in
Charlotte’s building trades. The bringing together of firms involved in
the building trades was especially popular in those communities, such as
Charlotte, that were dedicated to unremitting growth and expansion.
This concentration of architects, general contractors, and components
manufacturers, it was argued, would allow construction professionals to
respond more effectively to the increasingly complex building systems that
were appearing in urban centers of the United States, including those in
North Carolina, in the early twentieth century.
|

|
|
A photograph of the
Builders Building in 1927 |
Charles E. Lambeth was instrumental in bringing the Builders Building to
fruition. A native of Fayetteville, N.C., Lambeth had located here after
graduating from the University of North Carolina. Like so many Charlotte
businessmen of his era, Lambeth was a champion of entrepreneurial
enterprise. He wanted Charlotte to become a truly substantial place
and believed that locating construction businesses in a single edifice
would advance that goal.
M. R. “Steve” Marsh, a native of Jacksonville, Fla., came to
Charlotte in 1916 as chief draftsman for the architectural firm headed by
James Mackson McMichael (1870-1944). In 1922 Marsh opened his own
architectural and engineering company in Charlotte and continued to head
the firm until his retirement in 1964. That Marsh received the contract to
design the Builders Building was a real feather in his cap, so to speak,
because the new edifice was to be a showcase of what construction
professionals could accomplish. The design philosophy for the
Builders Building emphasized modernity.
Stylistically, the Builders Building appealed to the business elite’s
preference for traditionalist designs that reflected the conservative
political, social, and economic values that dominated the era of White
Supremacy in North Carolina. Its predominant architectural feature
and the one that gives the buildings its essential aesthetic character is
its regular fenestration.
Historical Background
Statement
The Builders Building was designed by Charlotte architect and engineer
Marion Rossiter “Steve” Marsh (1901-1977) and constructed in 1926-27 in
response to the building boom that was occurring in Charlotte and its
environs during the years immediately following World War One.[1]
Among its tenants were realtors, architects, surveyors, general
contractors, and accountants, to mention only a few.[2]
“It was intended to house the offices of all of Charlotte's contractors
and builders,” writes historian Thomas W. Hanchett, “in order to
facilitate sharing of technical information and hiring of subcontractors,
part of a nationwide movement for ‘builders exchanges’ that had begun
around the turn of the century.”[3]
|

|
|
Drawing of the
Builders Building. Note the arcade extending to the rear. |
The bringing together of firms involved in the building trades was
especially popular in those communities, such as Charlotte, that were
dedicated to unremitting growth and expansion.[4]
This concentration of architects, general contractors, and components
manufacturers, it was argued, would allow construction professionals to
respond more effectively to the increasingly complex building systems that
were appearing in urban centers of the United States, including those in
North Carolina, in the early twentieth century. A city like
Charlotte, “with its access to money, position, and information encouraged
change and growth, adaptation and adjustment,” write the authors of
Architects and Builders in North Carolina. A History of the Practice
of Building. They continue: “While architects and builders
gave up a certain amount of independence and control of their lives and
jobs, they also assimilated the changes brought on by the
industrialization of the building process into a way of working that could
take advantage of the progress and prosperity the new economy and society
seemed to offer.”[5]
The
impetus for constructing a home for Charlotte’s builders began in 1925.
“The proposition was discussed fully in business conferences, at clubs in
informal conferences,” reported the Charlotte Observer.[6]
The original concept was for the tenants of the building to buy stock and
thereby provide the necessary financing. When this arrangement
failed to materialize, V. P. Loftis, executive secretary of the North
Carolina branch of the General Contractors Association, approached
insurance executive and future Charlotte mayor Charles E. Lambeth
(1894?-1948), who agreed to loan the money to enable the project to move
forward. Architect M. R. Marsh was also involved in these
negotiations.[7]
It was altogether fitting that Charles Lambeth was instrumental in
bringing the Builders Building to fruition. A native of Fayetteville,
N.C., Lambeth had located here after graduating from the University of
North Carolina. His wife was Laura Cannon Lambeth, a daughter of
James William Cannon, a major figure in the Carolina textile industry and
a man of great wealth. Like so many Charlotte businessmen of his era,
Lambeth was a champion of entrepreneurial enterprise. He wanted
Charlotte to become a truly substantial place and believed that locating
construction businesses in a single edifice would advance that goal. “Few
buildings for such a purpose exist in the south,” the Charlotte
Observer announced. “There is one in Baltimore. One of somewhat
similar purpose in Atlanta. Charlotte is the sole city between these
two to have such a structure.”[8]
Newspaper articles published at the time the Builders Building was
completed in July 1927 express the New South creed of urban “boosterism”
that men like Lambeth and his rich father-in-law supported. “If the
architects, painters, plasterers, electrical men, and others, had not been
the type of men to develop with the city it is extremely doubtful if
Charlotte could have grown,” proclaimed the Charlotte Observer.
The newspaper continued: “Every year the number of new constructions in
the city has grown. Each year the aggregate figures for building
permits has mounted.”[9]
M. R. “Steve” Marsh, a native of Jacksonville, Fla., came to
Charlotte in 1916 as chief draftsman for the architectural firm headed by
James Mackson McMichael (1870-1944). He next worked as an engineer
for Peter Spence Gilchrist (1861-1947), a chemical engineer who
specialized in the installation of sulfuric acid plants. In 1922
Marsh opened his own architectural and engineering company in Charlotte
and continued to head the firm until his retirement in 1964. “He was one
of the pioneer architects in North Carolina,” said one of his associates.[10]
Marsh designed an impressive array of structures in Charlotte and the
region during his 42-year career. Among his local jobs were Temple
Israel, the Charlotte Coca-Cola Bottling Plant, the Oasis Temple, Selwyn
Avenue Presbyterian Church, the South Branch Library in Myers Park, the
Charlotte Armory Building, Chantilly Elementary School, Morris Field, plus
many more, including several residences.[11]
|

|
|
The advertisement for
Marsh appeared in the Charlotte Observer in July 1927 |
That Marsh received the contract to design the Builders Building was a
real feather in his cap, so to speak, because the new edifice was to be a
showcase of what construction professionals could accomplish. The
structure, which originally had a two-story arcade extending behind the
seven-story high-rise at the front, was intended to be an advertisement of
sorts for the building arts. “Charlotte latest addition to its major
buildings is perhaps more characteristic of its vast construction program
in the past few years than any other building in the city,” trumpeted the
Charlotte Observer.[12]
Located on the site of the home where Confederate General Stonewall
Jackson’s widow had resided for many years after the Civil War, the
Builders Building cost approximately $300,000 to erect and appoint.[13]
J. P. Little and Sons was the general contractor; and the great majority
of the subcontractors were also local firms, including the Grady Sign Co
for signage, J. D. Love for plastering, and the Acme Plumbing and
Electrical Company for wiring and plumbing.[14]
|

|

|
|
Marsh was architect for
Eastover School,
which opened in 1935. |
Marsh also designed
Chantilly School, the first school built in Charlotte after World War
Two. |
The
design philosophy for the Builders Building emphasized modernity, at least
within the context of the 1920s. Insisting that Charlotte was
“destined to be one of the South’s greatest cities,” Lambeth and his
associates wanted the “modern –fire proof-seven Builders’ Building” to be
a symbol of Charlotte’s economic prowess and promise.[15]
The seven-story high rise portion of the structure was not essential in
terms of function. Its primary purpose was to serve as a symbol of
progress and financial strength. According to the
authors of Architects and Builders in North Carolina. A History
of the Practice of Building, the “symbolic importance” of skyscrapers
as a “sign of progress, permanence, and prosperity was immeasurable.”[16]
Typical of the advertisements that appeared for subcontractors was that
for McDaniel-Federal Co., suppliers of decorative tiles for the Builders
Building. “IN ORDER that the Builders Building—representing as it
does, the building interests of Charlotte and territory—might be modern in
every way, Tile Wainscoting was used in the main lobby, or elevator
entrance,” the advertisement proclaimed.[17]
The Builders Building has experienced substantial
change since it was completed in 1927, both physically and in terms of
use. With the increased pace of suburbanization following World War
Two, construction firms left the Builders Building and occupied offices
mainly in outlying districts of the city, where ample parking for
automobiles was readily available. The entire arcade portion of the
building has been demolished, and the remaining high rise section contains
none of its interior decorative appointments or defining interior spaces.
Although a new elevator tower with bathrooms has been added to the rear,
the high rise section does remain mostly intact on the exterior. The
Builders Building does continue to house offices.
Architectural Context Statement
The 1920s was a decade of marked growth in Charlotte, including the
construction of several major high rises in the center city. Their
claims to be “modern” to the contrary notwithstanding, these buildings
were universally revivalist in terms of architectural style.
Even the Independence or Realty Building, Charlotte’s first steel-framed
skyscraper, was modified in 1927-28 to make it appear more “classical.”[18]
Other local high rises, such as the Johnston Building (1924), the
Commercial National Bank Building, and the First National Bank Building
(1926), likewise exhibited revivalist detailing.[19]
|

|

|
|
Architect William L.
Stoddard's Johnston Building was Charlotte's first Neo Classical style
skyscraper. |
Charlotte architect
Louis Asbury, Sr. designed the First National Bank Building in the Neo
Classical style. |
Architectural historians ascribe the business elite’s preference for
traditionalist designs to the conservative political, social, and economic
values that dominated the era of White Supremacy in North Carolina.
”Political power and legal control remained in the hands of the
wealthy—whether former landed gentry or the newly rich industrialists—who
hired architects and general contractors to create a fabric of building
that was consonant with their values,” assert Catherine W. Bisher,
Charlotte V. Brown, Carl R. Lounsbury, and Enest H. Wood III.[20]
Architects and builders “attempted to meet the needs of the conservative
capitalists and urban dwellers who swelled the population and the gross
national product in a society that remained conservative politically and
socially.”[21]
Thomas Hanchett contends that the local penchant for Neo-Classicism
resulted in part from the emergence of business leaders in Charlotte who
were less willing than their predecessors to take risks. “The
generation of New South leaders, including D. A. Tompkins, Edward Dilworth
Latta, and George Stephens, who had taken enormous risks to turn the
Piedmont into a major industrial region, were passing their power on to a
new generation” says Hanchett. “The new leaders seemed much less
adventuresome, willing to follow in the directions set by their
predecessors. Their homes and offices reflected this increased interest in
tradition over innovation, in social correctness rather than risk-taking.”[22]
The Builders Building fits readily within this framework. Its
predominant architectural feature and the one that gives the buildings its
essential aesthetic character is its regular fenestration, to which
ornamentation on the facades is clearly subordinate.
Physical Description
The Builders Building is a rectangular, five-bay wide by three-bay deep,
seven-story with basement, steel-framed high rise. It faces south
and is located at 312 W. Trade Street just east of its intersection with
N. Pine St. The lot, which is paved, slopes down slightly toward the
north. The other structures that once fronted the 300 block of W. Trade
St. have been destroyed, making the Builders Building stand alone. A
two-story arcade that once extended northward from the rear of the
building has been demolished, and an elevator tower with bathrooms and
balconies and containing the main entrance to the building has been added
in recent years. The building has a flat roof covered with stone. A
brick structure that once housed original mechanical equipment is still
atop the building. Except for some mechanical equipment in the basement,
the interior of the building retains none of its original character.
The masonry-faced southern façade, the most
prominent architectural feature of the Builder’s Building, retains
much of its original physical integrity. The fenestration pattern is
regular, with a pair of 1/1 double-hung sash in each bay ascending from
the second to the top floor of the structure. The street level front
consists of five bays, the center bay having a replacement entrance and
the flanking bays having large, single-lighted, fixed windows. A
classical masonry cornice molding adorns the first floor, and fluted
pilasters with pedestals and finials flank each of the five bays on the
top floor of the façade. Coffered-like masonry panels are above the
windows on the top floor, and a masonry pediment surmounts the center bay
of the façade.
The identical side elevations of the building are more modest.
Sheathed in yellow-enamel brick laid in common bond, the facades have 1/1
double-hung sash in the outer bays, and six small, rectangular, fixed
windows are on the first floor. Three header courses with the brick
laid vertically decorate the facades, as do vertical string courses with
masonry corner blocks.
|

|
|
This plaque in the
sidewalk denotes that the home of Stonewall Jackson's widow stood on
the site. |
[1]
Charlotte Observer, 17 July, 1927. This edition of the
newspaper contains numerous articles on aspects of the Builders
Building. The first mention of the plan to construct the Builders
Building appears in the Charlotte Observer, 1 September, 1926.
This article also contains a rendering of the building. Marsh’s
obituary article appears in Charlotte Observer, 5 September,
1977.
[2]
The first list of tenants of the Builders Building, initially called the
Lambeth Building, appears in the Charlotte City Directory (1927),
1161.
[3]
Thomas W. Hanchett, n.d. “Charlotte Architecture: Design Through
Time Part 2.” http://landmarkscommission.org/educationarchitecturept.2.htm.
Hereinafter cited as Hanchett.
[4]
For an overview of Charlotte-Mecklenburg history, including programs of
economic expansion, see Dan L. Morrill, Historic Charlotte.
An Illustrated History of Charlotte & Mecklenburg County (San
Antonio, Texas: Historical Publishing Network, 2001).
[5]
Catherine W. Bisher, Charlotte V. Brown, Carl R. Lounsbury, and Enest H.
Wood III, Architects and Builders in North Carolina. A History
of the Practice of Building (Chapel Hill & London: The University of
North Carolina Press, 1990), 292, 293. Herinafter cited as
Bisher.
[6]
Charlotte Observer, 17 July, 1927.
[9]
Charlotte Observer, 17 July, 1927.
[10]
Charlotte Observer, 5 September, 1977. For a listing of the
buildings designed by M. R. Marsh, see “The Work Of M. R. Marsh And
Successor Architects,” a manuscript in the Special Collections
Department in the Atkins Library of the University of North Carolina at
Charlotte, hereinafter cited as Marsh.
[12]
Charlotte Observer, 17 July, 1927.
[13]
Charlotte Observer, 1 September, 1926.
[14]
Charlotte Observer, 17 July, 1927.
[17]
Charlotte Observer, 17 July, 1927.
[19]
Charlotte North Carolina. Diversified Industrial and Commercial
Center (Charlotte: The Observer Printing House, Inc., 1930.
[22]
Hanchett. The Builder's Building belongs most readily to
what Marcus Whiffen calls the Commercial Style. This style thrived
in Chicago as nowhere else. Structures of this genre were designed to
meet the needs of commerce. Providing light and efficient space
was stressed at the expense of exterior ornamentation. See Marcus
Whiffen, American Architecture Since 1780 A Guide to the Styles
(Cambridge and London: The M.I.T. Press, 1969), 183-190.
|
 |
 |
|
Builders Building
in Minneapolis, Minnesota |
Builders Exchange
Building in San Antionio, Texas |